Posts Tagged ‘russia’

Perhaps World War III (IV?) (V?) (N+1?) (Aleph-null?)

Friday, September 12th, 2008

While I was working on a piece now out in the latest issue of The American Conservative about the relevance to US policy on the Russia-Georgia conflict of the epochally disastrous mistake of the Asquith-Grey government of Britain of choosing war with Germany officially in order to defend Belgium, I asked myself several times, “Since even the hawkiest of hawks in John McCain’s foreign policy shop understand that war with Russia means a thermonuclear exchange and billions of deaths, isn’t it a bit of a stretch to suggest their aggressive posturing towards Russia really tokens a willingness to fight such a war?” And in moments of doubt, I found myself answering, “perhaps so.” But then events would allay my skepticism. Like the time John McCain’s vice-presidential nominee casually told Charlie Gibson that the policy her running-mate has favored at least since his debonair pal Misha first charmed him and that she has favored since at least last Tuesday of extending membership in NATO to Georgia, Ukraine, and other former Soviet satellites locked in territorial disputes with the Russian Federation might in fact obligate the United States to go to war with Russia.

She’s even more correct than her attempt to recite the definition of “alliance” suggests; Article V of the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty on which the NATO alliance is founded obligates member states to regard attacks on any of them as attacks on all them, so if Georgia had been a NATO member at the beginning of August, the Russian invasion would have triggered a de lege state of war between the US and the Russian Federation. Of course, this fact means that NATO and its leading power have to be extremely conservative and judicious in any potential extension of membership in the alliance, and in particular, must not take steps to bring peripheral states involved in territorial conflicts with nuclear superpowers into NATO and thereby endanger billions of lives. And that’s just a minimal conclusion. The insanity of what the Russia hawks have been up to since August 9 warrants some serious reconsideration among those who had been bullish about the idea of the wisdom of extending NATO membership anywhere, if not of the wisdom of retaining the alliance in a post-Soviet world at all. (more…)

Arctic Circle Fun Facts

Sunday, August 31st, 2008

§ The westernmost point in the Americas, Cape Prince of Wales, Alaska, USA, sits across the Bering Strait from Cape Dezhnyov, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Russian Federation, the easternmost point in Asia — the latter federal district governed by Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich, a former oil executive who in addition to his gubernatorial duties is also Chairman of the Government, Chairman of the Security Council, and Head of the Anti-Terror Committee of the district.

(more…)

Back in the USSR

Monday, August 18th, 2008

Daniel Larison has some fun at the expense of Roger Kimball, an unserious man in a serious bowtie, who is one of many “thinkers” to see John McCain’s extra-sensory detection of the letters K-G-B in Vladimir Putin’s eyes, and raise him a U-S-S-R. Now, crazy as the notion that foreign policy towards the Soviet Union is substitutable salva veritate for foreign policy towards the Russian Federation may be, Daniel is being far too charitable in crediting a hypothetical hawk who claims “that Moscow is trying to reassemble parts of the pre-revolutionary Russian Empire” with avoiding “embarrassing himself by saying completely nonsensical things.” Really? There was fairly considerable overlap between the territory of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union, including the only non-Russian territory Russian troops occupy at present, so the available data doesn’t tell us precisely which prior frightening Russian polity Messrs. Putin and Medvedev are trying to reassemble, nor (therefore) which rapacious expansionist regime’s rebirth we’re going to have to go to pre-emptive war to, um, pre-empt. (Could it be that Putin is really trying to re-establish the Kievan Rus? That man is capable of anything, after all.) More to the point, as Daniel says, Kimball &co. couldn’t say the things they are saying if they knew what ’soviet’ means, but just as the workers’ councils have gone the way of the passenger pigeon, so have any number of the political and cultural artifacts of the Rossiyskaya Imperiya. And on the other hand, there are features the Russian Federation shares with the USSR — like a tank army and a nuclear arsenal — that certaintly weren’t present in the empire of the Tsars. Which is unsurprising. As has been noted before, “any two things share infinitely many properties, and fail to share infinitely many others. That is so whether the two things are perfect duplicates or utterly dissimilar.” Comparing the Russian Federation to the Russian Empire: nutty. Comparing the Russian Federation to the Soviet Union: also nutty. (Which is nuttier? Depends on which dissimilar features are particularly salient, which in turn depends on context and subjectivity.)

Just and Unjust Europeans

Sunday, August 17th, 2008

Michael Walzer has a short, sharp online-only piece for Dissent about the Georgian crisis. A few points in response: (A) Walzer’s point (1), about how Russia’s war is an “unjust war,” seems to fail to recognize a distinction whose essentiality to discussing the justice of war Walzer himself is most responsible for promulgating, namely the distinction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello, or just cause and just conduct. Clearly, Russia’s behavior fails appallingly on the second score. But the first is murkier. The Russian invasion was of course hardly launched for humanitarian purposes, and as Walzer notes, “the Russian claim that the Georgians killed or injured 2,000 civilians [isn't] credible.” Nonetheless, Georgia triggered the conflict with an unjust attack on Abkhazian and South Ossetian separatists. It can’t be that Russia doesn’t even have an arguably legitimate interest in protecting them.

(more…)