<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Brooks and Mr. Hyde Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theartofthepossible.net/2008/06/24/dr-brooks-and-mr-hyde-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theartofthepossible.net/2008/06/24/dr-brooks-and-mr-hyde-park/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mona</title>
		<link>http://www.theartofthepossible.net/2008/06/24/dr-brooks-and-mr-hyde-park/#comment-4651</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theartofthepossible.net/?p=299#comment-4651</guid>
		<description>Daniel, &lt;i&gt;d'accord.&lt;/i&gt; And also welcome -- I agree with Jim that you are one smart and insightful dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, <i>d&#8217;accord.</i> And also welcome &#8212; I agree with Jim that you are one smart and insightful dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.theartofthepossible.net/2008/06/24/dr-brooks-and-mr-hyde-park/#comment-4647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theartofthepossible.net/?p=299#comment-4647</guid>
		<description>I just want to give Daniel a big fat welcome. Great inaugural post, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to give Daniel a big fat welcome. Great inaugural post, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Koffler</title>
		<link>http://www.theartofthepossible.net/2008/06/24/dr-brooks-and-mr-hyde-park/#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Koffler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theartofthepossible.net/?p=299#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>No, not at all. We're not disagreeing. I'm for totally unlimited fundraising by anyone for any cause + transparency. What I'm against is the law reifying some formal separation between a campaign and issues advocacy on its behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not at all. We&#8217;re not disagreeing. I&#8217;m for totally unlimited fundraising by anyone for any cause + transparency. What I&#8217;m against is the law reifying some formal separation between a campaign and issues advocacy on its behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona</title>
		<link>http://www.theartofthepossible.net/2008/06/24/dr-brooks-and-mr-hyde-park/#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theartofthepossible.net/?p=299#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>Money quote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;E.g., the McCain-Feingold regime shunts what would previously have been soft money donations directly to campaigns into so-called independent “527″ efforts and created a legal veneer of plausible deniability by which a candidate can separate herself from independent expenditures on her behalf, while creating new avenues by which people can be prosecuted for running afoul of pointless regulation, and continuing to confiscate the property of citizens to spend on political causes they may or may not support. All in all, a pretty abysmal result from a libertarian, liberal, or conservative perspective.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And so now do we go after the 527s? Blogger-fundraising for issues advocacy? I have sympathy for those who want to take vast corporate $$ out of elections, but cannot see any cure that isn't as bad as, if not worse than, the disease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>E.g., the McCain-Feingold regime shunts what would previously have been soft money donations directly to campaigns into so-called independent “527″ efforts and created a legal veneer of plausible deniability by which a candidate can separate herself from independent expenditures on her behalf, while creating new avenues by which people can be prosecuted for running afoul of pointless regulation, and continuing to confiscate the property of citizens to spend on political causes they may or may not support. All in all, a pretty abysmal result from a libertarian, liberal, or conservative perspective.</p></blockquote>
<p>And so now do we go after the 527s? Blogger-fundraising for issues advocacy? I have sympathy for those who want to take vast corporate $$ out of elections, but cannot see any cure that isn&#8217;t as bad as, if not worse than, the disease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
